(PS) Nelson v. Shasta County Courts
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 FONTELLA FRANSCINE NELSON, No. 2:22-cv-00347 TLN AC PS Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SHASTA COUNTY COURTS, et al., Defendants. 15 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. The action was accordingly referred to the undersigned for pretrial matters by E.D. Cal. R. (“Local Rule”) 302(c)(21). On March 15, 2022, the court granted plaintiff’s in forma pauperis (“IFP”) application but rejected the complaint, granting plaintiff 30 days to file an amended complaint. ECF No. 4. Plaintiff was cautioned that failure to do so could lead to a recommendation that the action be dismissed. Plaintiff did not file an amended complaint within the time limit. On April 20, 2022, the court issued an order to show cause within 14 days why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. ECF No. 5. Plaintiff has not responded to the court’s orders, nor taken any action to prosecute this case. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY…