CDCR

(PC) Lamon v. CDCR

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 5, 20222:22-cv-00703California805 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BARRY LOUIS LAMON, No. 2:22-cv-0703 CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

CORRECTION AND REHABILIATION,

et al., Defendants. 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with an action for violation of civil rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and violations of California law against employees of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Plaintiff requests leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Title 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) reads as follows: In no event shall a prisoner bring a civil action . . . [in forma pauperis] if the prisoner has, on 3 or more prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.