(SS) O'Brien v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 6, 20221:21-cv-00479California447 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WENDY APRIL O’BRIEN, Case No. 1:21-cv-00479-HBK Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PARTIES’ JOINT

MOTION TO REMAND UNDER SENTENCE

v. FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), REVERSING

FINAL DECISION AND REMANDING

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, CASE2

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY, (Doc. No. 13) Defendant. ORDER TO TERMINATE ALL PENDING

MOTIONS AND DEADLINES

18 Pending before the Court is the Parties’ Joint Motion to Remand filed May 3, 2022. (Doc. No. 13). Plaintiff Wendy April O’Brien and the Commissioner of Social Security agree that this case should be remanded for further administrative proceedings under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). (Id.). The United States Supreme Court held that the Social Security Act permits remand in conjunction with a judgment either affirming, reversing, or modifying the Secretary’s decision. 25 1 Kilolo Kijakazi became the Acting Commissioner of Social…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.