(PS) Hassouna v. Regents of the University of CA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JENNIFER LORRAINE HASSOUNA, Case No. 2:20-cv-02179-JAM-JDP (PS) Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS

CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND FAILURE

TO STATE A CLAIM

REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, et al., RESPONSE DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN DAYS Defendants. 16 On November 9, 2021, the court screened plaintiff’s complaint, notified her that it failed to state a claim, and gave her thirty days to file an amended complaint. ECF No. 3. To date, plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. To manage its docket effectively, the court imposes deadlines on litigants and requires litigants to meet those deadlines. The court may dismiss a case for plaintiff’s failure to prosecute or failure to comply with its orders or local rules. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Hells Canyon Pres. Council v. U.S. Forest Serv., 403 F.3d 683, 689 (9th Cir. 2005); Carey v. King, 856 F.2d 1439, 24 …