Global Commodities Trading Group, Inc. v. Beneficio De Arroz Choloma, S.A.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 6, 20222:16-cv-01045California4,709 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GLOBAL COMMODITIES TRADING No. 2:16-cv-1045-TLN-CKD GROUP, INC., et al. , FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Plaintiffs, AND ORDER v. 14 BENEFICIO DE ARROZ CHOLOMA, (ECF No. 164) S.A., et al., Defendants. 17 Plaintiffs, Global Commodities Trading Group, Inc. (“Global”) and The Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (“Insurance Company”), move the court for default judgment against defendants Beneficio de Arroz Choloma, S.A. (“Bachosa”), Sady Farid Andonie Reyes (“Reyes”), and Joyce Mary Jarufe Dox (“Dox”). (ECF No. 164.) This action arises from an alleged breach of contract for the shipment of rice and corn from the United States to Honduras. Plaintiffs allege Bachosa breached the terms of an agreement for repayment, after which Bachosa and Reyes failed to pay amounts due on a subsequent promissory note guaranteed by Reyes and Dox. By this motion, plaintiffs seek a default judgment against…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.