(PC) Suarez v. Clark

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 9, 20221:22-cv-00160California1,258 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSE ALFREDO SUAREZ, ) Case No.: 1:22-cv-00160-JLT-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER HOLDING FINDINGS AND v. ) RECOMMENDATIONS IN ABEYANCE,

GRANTING PLAINTIFF THIRTY DAYS TO FILE

KEN CLARK, et al., ) AN AMENDED COMPLAINT, AND DIRECTING ) CLERK OF COURT TO SEND PLAINTIFF Defendants. ) COURTESY COPIES ) ) Plaintiff Jose Alfredo Suarez is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On March 25, 2022, the Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint, and found that he stated a cognizable excessive force claim against Defendant O. Valladolid, a cognizable failure to intervene claim against Defendants B. Camargo, Gamboa, and John Doe No. 4, and a cognizable retaliation claim against Defendant Gamboa. (ECF No. 13.) Plaintiff was granted the opportunity to file an amended complaint or notify the Court of his intent to proceed on the claims…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.