Heard
Heard v. Walmart Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CRYSTAL ANN HEARD, Case No. 1:19-cv-01626-JLT-BAK (BAM)
Plaintiff, ORDER VACATING HEARING
v. ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
MODIFY THE COURT’S SCHEDULING
WALMART, INC., ORDER PURSUANT TO FRCP 16(b)(4)
Defendant. (Doc. 44)
Currently before the Court is Defendant Walmart, Inc.’s (“Defendant”) Motion to Modify the Court’s Scheduling Order Pursuant to FRCP 16(b)(4). (Doc. 44.) Plaintiff Crystal Ann Heard (“Plaintiff”) has not filed a timely opposition to the motion, and the Court finds the motion suitable for decision without the need for oral argument. Accordingly, the hearing on the motion currently set for May 13, 2022, is HEREBY VACATED, and the matter is submitted on the record. E.D. Cal. L.R. 230(g). Having considered the briefing as well as the entire record in this case, Defendant’s Motion to Modify the Court’s Scheduling Order will be denied pursuant to Federal Rue of Civil 26 …