(PS) McDonald v. Department of Motor Vehicles

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 9, 20222:21-cv-01561California2,588 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MITCHEL MCDONALD, No. 2:21-cv-1561 KJM DB PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

MOTOR VEHICLES IN SACRAMENTO

COUNTY, Defendant. 17 Plaintiff Mitchel McDonald is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Pending before the court are plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, motion for extension of time to file an amended complaint, an amended complaint, a request to remove the undersigned from this action, and a request to appoint a special master. (ECF Nos. 2, 5-8.) The amended complaint alleges that the defendant discriminated against plaintiff by enacting policies in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The court is required to screen complaints brought by parties proceeding in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.