(PS) McDonald v. Department of Motor Vehicles
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MITCHEL MCDONALD, No. 2:21-cv-1561 KJM DB PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
MOTOR VEHICLES IN SACRAMENTO
COUNTY, Defendant. 17 Plaintiff Mitchel McDonald is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Pending before the court are plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, motion for extension of time to file an amended complaint, an amended complaint, a request to remove the undersigned from this action, and a request to appoint a special master. (ECF Nos. 2, 5-8.) The amended complaint alleges that the defendant discriminated against plaintiff by enacting policies in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The court is required to screen complaints brought by parties proceeding in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. §…