Moreno

(PC) Richson-Bey v. Moreno

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 9, 20221:21-cv-01294California753 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SEAN JEFFERY RICHSON-BEY, ) Case No. 1:21-cv-01294-AWI-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER VACATING FINDINGS AND v. ) RECOMMENDATIONS

R. MORENO, et al., ) (ECF No. 17) )

Defendants. ) ) )

Plaintiff Sean Jeffery Richson-Bey is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On April 29, 2022, the Court issued Findings and Recommendations recommending that this action proceed on Plaintiff’s retaliation claim against Defendant Moreno and that Plaintiff’s due process claims be dismissed as barred by the favorable termination rule set forth in Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 486-87 (1994). (ECF No. 17.) The Findings and Recommendations were served on Plaintiff and contained notice that objections were to be filed within fourteen days. (Id. at 7.) Plaintiff filed objections on May 6, 2022. (ECF No. 18.) In his objections,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.