Path

(PC) Harper v. Path

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 11, 20221:21-cv-00558California658 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOHNATHAN SETH HARPER, Case No. 1:21-cv-00558 JLT HBK Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, DENYING

v. PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL

NOTICE, AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

WELL PATH, ET. AL., REQUEST FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF Defendants. (Docs. 12, 13, 17, and 23) 16 Johnathan Seth Harper initiated this action proceeding pro se by filing a prisoner civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 while confined at the Kings County Jail. (Doc. 1.) The matter was referred to the assigned United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Eastern District of California Local Rule 302. Plaintiff filed motions for injunctive relief—including a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction—on December 27, 2021 (Doc. 13) and March 10, 2022 (Doc. 17). The magistrate judge found the motions were procedurally and substantively defective. (Doc. 23 at 7-8.) The magistrate…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.