(PC)Ruiz
(PC)Ruiz v. Stane
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROGELIO MAY RUIZ, Case No. 1:22-cv-00236-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION
TO APPOINT COUNSEL AND MOTION
v. FOR AN INTERPRETER M. STANE, ET. AL., (Doc. No. 2) Defendants. 16 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to appoint counsel and for an interpreter, filed on February 22, 2022. (Doc. No. 2). Plaintiff initiated this action by filing a pro se prisoner civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in the Sacramento Division of this Court, which was transferred to this Court on February 25, 2022. (Doc. Nos. 1, 4). Although the entire motion is written in Spanish, not English, the Court is able to discern that Plaintiff seeks the appointment of counsel and an interpreter for this case. (See generally Doc. No. 2). Motions and court filings must be in English. The Court has warned Plaintiff about this requirement on many occasions. See e.g. Ruiz v. Mobert, Case…