(PC) Maldonado v. State of CA

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 11, 20222:21-cv-02172California492 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 BILLY RAE SHANEE MALDONADO, Case No. 2:21-cv-02172-KJM-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

THAT PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION TO

v. PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS BE

DENIED AND HE BE DIRECTED TO

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., TENDER THE FILING FEE IN ORDER TO

PROCEED WITH THIS ACTION

Defendants. ECF No. 2

FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE TO FILE

OBJECTIONS 16 17 18 Plaintiff previously filed a complaint, ECF No. 1, and a request to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No. 2. After reviewing his litigation history, I concluded that he was a “three- striker” within the meaning of Title 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). ECF No. 6. I also found that his

22 1 Plaintiff has filed at least three cases that have been dismissed for failure to state a claim: (1) Maldonado v. Yates, No. 1:11-cv-01735-LJO-GSA (E.D. Cal. 2013); (2) Maldonado v. Trimble, No. 1:11-cv-02160-LJO-DLB (E.D. Cal. 2013); and …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.