(PC) Maldonado v. State of CA
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 11, 20222:21-cv-02172California492 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 BILLY RAE SHANEE MALDONADO, Case No. 2:21-cv-02172-KJM-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
THAT PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION TO
v. PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS BE
DENIED AND HE BE DIRECTED TO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., TENDER THE FILING FEE IN ORDER TO
PROCEED WITH THIS ACTION
Defendants. ECF No. 2
FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE TO FILE
OBJECTIONS 16 17 18 Plaintiff previously filed a complaint, ECF No. 1, and a request to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No. 2. After reviewing his litigation history, I concluded that he was a “three- striker” within the meaning of Title 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). ECF No. 6. I also found that his
22 1 Plaintiff has filed at least three cases that have been dismissed for failure to state a claim: (1) Maldonado v. Yates, No. 1:11-cv-01735-LJO-GSA (E.D. Cal. 2013); (2) Maldonado v. Trimble, No. 1:11-cv-02160-LJO-DLB (E.D. Cal. 2013); and …