(HC) Pourlashgari v. Shasta County Superior Court

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 11, 20222:22-cv-00430California631 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 HAMED DANESHMAND Case No. 2:22-cv-00430-JDP (HC)

POURLASHGARI,

ORDER: Petitioner, (1) GRANTING PETITIONER’S v. APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS; AND

SHASTA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT,

(2) DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT TO Respondent. ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE TO RULE ON THESE FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

15 ECF No. 6

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

THAT THE PETITION BE DISMISSED

WITHOUT PREJUDICE AS

UNEXHAUSTED ECF No. 2 20 Petitioner, proceeding without counsel, seeks a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. He admits, however, that he did not exhaust his claim in state court before filing this petition. ECF No. 2 at 7-8. Thus, I will recommend that the petition be dismissed without…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.