Cissna

(PC) Shropshire v. Cissna

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 11, 20222:21-cv-01693California1,362 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RYAN NEIL SHROPSHIRE, Case No. 2:21-cv-01693-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA

v. PAUPERIS TERRIE CISSNA, et al., ECF Nos. 7 & 10 Defendants. SCREENING ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF: (1) FILE AN AMENDED

COMPLAINT; OR

17 (2) STAND BY HIS COMPLAINT SUBJECT TO A RECOMMENDATION

THAT IT BE DISMISSED

19 ECF No. 1

THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE

21 Plaintiff Ryan Shropshire is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in this civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He alleges that defendant Cissna falsified a search warrant affidavit and fabricated evidence for use against him in his criminal trial. ECF No. 1. Because his claims appear to contest the validity of his criminal conviction, which has not terminated in his favor, they are barred under the Heck doctrine. I will give plaintiff an

…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.