Quick

(PC) Jackson v. Quick

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 11, 20221:19-cv-01591California587 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 CORNEL JACKSON, Case No. 1:19-cv-01591-JLT-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE

OPPOSITION OR STATEMENT OF NON-

v. OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

JASON QUICK, et al., (ECF No. 108) Defendants.

14 Plaintiff Cornel Jackson is a pretrial detainee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On April 7, 2022, Defendants Jayson Quick, Elizabeth Alvarez, Alvaro Rossette, Jim Followill, Lisette Lopez, Dominic Ramos, Hermina Marley, and Carmela Prudente moved for summary judgment respecting Plaintiff’s claims that the Defendants violated Plaintiff’s First and Sixth Amendment rights with respect to Plaintiff’s legal correspondence and for conspiracies to violate such rights, and Defendant Elizabeth Alvarez moved for summary judgment on Plaintiff’s claim against Defendant Alvarez for violating Plaintiff’s right of access to the courts. (ECF…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.