Trate

(HC) McCoy v. Trate

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 11, 20221:22-cv-00031California816 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 REGINALD L. MCCOY, Case No. 1:22-cv-00031-HBK (HC) Petitioner, ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S MOTION

FOR STATUS CONFERENCE

v. (Doc. No. 5) B.M. TRATE,

ORDER FINDING PETITIONER’S MOTION

Respondent. TO VACATE CONSTRUED MOTION FOR

CLERK’S DEFAULT MOOT

16 (Doc. No. 19)

ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S MOTION

TO COMPEL (Doc. No. 21) 20 Pending before the Court are Petitioner’s request for status conference, motion to vacate an erroneously mischaracterized motion for clerk’s default, and motion to compel discovery. (Doc. Nos. 5, 19, 21). Petitioner, who is pro se, has pending a petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. (Doc. No. 1). On March 24, 2022, Petitioner filed a “request for judgment in Petitioner’s favor as a matter of law.” (Doc. No. 15). On April 13, 2022, the Court construed Petitioner’s request as a motion for a clerk’s default, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.