(PS) The Ruth Camel, Estate v. Nash Weber

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 12, 20222:22-cv-00645California1,331 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RUTH CAMEL ESTATE, No. 2:22–cv–645–KJM–KJN PS Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF

v. SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION SHIRLEY NASH WEBER, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff proceeds without counsel in this action, and was previously granted permission to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (ECF No. 2, 3.) The undersigned screened plaintiff’s complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915, noted deficiencies, and twice granted plaintiff leave to amend with instructions for amendment. Plaintiff filed her second amended complaint but, as before, plaintiff’s latest filing fails to make out the required allegations indicating the court has subject matter jurisdiction over the matter. Thus, the undersigned recommends the complaint be dismissed. Further, given plaintiff’s failures to cure the deficiencies, the undersigned recommends no further leave to amend be granted, the complaint be dismissed without prejudice,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.