Tang
Gilbert v. Tang
Trial Court Opinion
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8 DARREN GILBERT, Case No. 1:22-cv-00094-DAD-SAB Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT
TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST THE
V. DOCKET TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 41(a) CHHIENG TANG, et al., OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL
PROCEDURE
Defendants. (ECF No. 15) 14 On May 10, 2022, Plaintiff filed a notice of voluntary dismissal. (ECF No. 15.) In light 16 of the notice of dismissal, this action has been terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)Gi); Wilson 17 v.City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice. Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY DIRECTED to close the case and adjust 19 the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule 41(a). 20
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FA. 99 Dated: _May 11, 2022 ;
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
28