Saba

(PC) Davis v. Saba

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 10, 20222:22-cv-00269California429 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DEMETRIUS DAVIS, No. 2:22-cv-0269 AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

SABA, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, who appears to be a former state prisoner proceeding pro se, seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and has requested authority pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF Nos. 1, 5, 6. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). On February 11, 2022, the court served plaintiff via U.S. Mail with new case documents at his address of record. Thereafter, on February 28, 2022, the documents were returned as “undeliverable, not in custody.” Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), however, service of documents at the address of record for plaintiff is fully effective. It is plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. To date, plaintiff has not filed a notice of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.