Floyd
(PC) Craver v. Floyd
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANDRE RAMON CRAVER, No. 2:20-cv-02327 WBS DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER C. FLOYD, Defendant.
16 Plaintiff is a state inmate proceeding pro se with an action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims that defendant violated his Eighth Amendment rights. Presently before the court is plaintiff’s motion to compel. (ECF No. 23.) For the reasons set forth below, the court will grant in part and deny in part plaintiff’s motion to compel. MOTION TO COMPEL I. Background This action proceeds on plaintiff’s complaint against California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”) Dietician, C. Floyd. (ECF No. 1.) Following screening of the complaint, the court issued a Discovery and Scheduling Order (“DSO”) on December 7, 2021. (ECF No. 21.) This order provided that parties could conduct discovery until April 15, 2022. (Id. at 6.) The order specified that “all requests for…