(PS) Jones v. Velocity Technology Solutions

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 11, 20222:19-cv-02374California564 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Garrison Jones, No. 2:19-cv-02374-KJM-JDP Plaintiff, ORDER Vv. Velocity Technology Solutions, et al., 1S Defendants. 16 In a previous order, this court dismissed plaintiff Garrison Jones’s first amended complaint with leave to amend in part. See generally Prev. Order (Sept. 28, 2021), ECF No. 98. Jones moves to vacate that order. See generally Mot. Vacate, ECF No. 128. The defendants oppose the motion, and Jones has replied. See generally Opp’n, ECF No. 131; Replies, ECF Nos. 133, 134, 135, 136. The matter was submitted without a hearing. The court construes the motion as a request for reconsideration of a non-final order under 23 this court’s inherent authority. See City of Los Angeles, Harbor Div. v. Santa Monica Baykeeper, 254 F.3d 882, 885 (9th Cir. 2001). The motion is denied. See Cachil Dehe Band of Wintun Indians of Colusa Indian Cmty. v. California, 649 F.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.