(PC) Curtis v. State of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KEITH A. CURTIS, No. 2:21-cv-1601 AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Defendants. 16 By order filed May 2, 2022, the court found that if the improper entity defendants were disregarded, only defendants located in the Northern District of California would remain. ECF No. 10. The Northern District of California is also where the conduct alleged to have violated plaintiff’s rights occurred. Id. Plaintiff was therefore ordered to show cause why this case should not be transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Id. Plaintiff has now responded. ECF No. 11. In his response to the order to show cause, plaintiff asserts that this case should remain in this court because he is adding the California Health Care Facility (CHCF) in Stockton as a defendant, as well as several individuals who work at that facility and who are…