(PS) Peacemaker v. Mitchell

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 11, 20222:21-cv-01715California893 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHIRLY A. PEACEMAKER, Case No. 2:21-cv-01715-KJM-JDP (PS) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

v. ECF No. 2 MONICA MITCHELL,

SCREENING ORDER

Defendant. ECF No. 1

THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE

17 18 Plaintiff has filed a complaint about a notice of rent increase, but it contains no basis for 19 federal jurisdiction and no allegations against the named defendant. I will give plaintiff an 20 opportunity to amend her complaint before recommending that it be dismissed. I will also grant 21 plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF No. 2. 22 Screening and Pleading Requirements 23 Plaintiff’s complaint is subject to screening under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). The court must 24 dismiss any action filed in forma pauperis that is frivolous, malicious, fails to state a claim upon 25 which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from 26 suit. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). 27 28 A complaint must contain a short…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.