Debbs

Debbs v. Valley Convalscent Hospital

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 12, 20221:22-cv-00248California449 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EURAL DEBBS, SR., ) Case No.: 1:22-cv-00248-AWI-BAK (EPG) ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION ) SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE v. ) TO COMPLY WITH THE COURT’S ORDERS ) VALLEY CONVALSCENT HOSPITAL, ) [21-DAY DEADLINE]

Defendant. ) ) )

On March 21, 2022, the Court issued a screening order for plaintiff to, within thirty days, (1) file a second amended complaint, or (2) notify the Court that he wants to stand on his first amended complaint. (ECF No. 6). More than thirty days have passed, and the plaintiff has not complied with the Court’s order. The Local Rules, corresponding with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11, provide, “[f]ailure of counsel or of a party to comply with . . . any order of the Court may be grounds for imposition by the Court of any and all sanctions . . . within the inherent power of the Court.” Local Rule 110. “District courts have inherent…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.