Marsh

Marsh v. Bank of Sierra, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 13, 20221:22-cv-00508California2,894 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TERRANCE MARSH, Case No. 1:22-cv-00508-JLT-BAK (SKO) Plaintiff, FIRST SCREENING ORDER v. ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF TO: BANK OF SIERRA, INC., et al., (1) FILE A FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; OR Defendants. (2) NOTIFY THE COURT THAT HE WISHES TO STAND ON HIS

COMPLAINT

17 (Doc. 1)

THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE

20 Plaintiff Terrance Marsh is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action. Plaintiff filed his complaint on April 29, 2022. (Doc. 1). Upon review, the Court concludes that the complaint states one cognizable claim. Plaintiff has the following options as to how to proceed: (1) Plaintiff may file an amended complaint, which the Court will screen in due course; or alternatively, (2) Plaintiff may file a statement with the Court stating he wants to stand on this complaint. I. SCREENING REQUIREMENT In cases where the plaintiff is proceeding in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.