(PS) Shoaga v. Nelson III

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 12, 20222:21-cv-01953California2,294 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAIMI SHOAGA, No. 2:21-cv-01953 JAM CKD PS Plaintiff, v. PROVISIONAL ORDER ANDREW NELSON III et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se. This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Plaintiff asserts employment-related claims against defendants Andrew Nelson III and California Healthcare Medical Facility (CHMF). One month after filing the original complaint, plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint (“FAC,” ECF No. 3), which was served on defendants. Defendants have filed a motion to dismiss the FAC, which is fully briefed. (ECF Nos. 9, 13 & 14.) On May 11, 2022, a virtual hearing was held on defendants’ motion. Deputy Attorney General James Curran appeared on behalf of defendants. Due to technical difficulties, plaintiff did not appear at the Zoom hearing until the matter was already submitted. For the reasons 26 1 Because…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.