Mayes
(PC) Underwood v. Mayes
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ERROL LOVELL UNDERWOOD, No. 2:22-cv-0694 DB P Plaintiff, ORDER ROBERT MAYES, et al.. Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. §1983. Before the court are plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and plaintiff’s complaint for screening. For the reasons set forth below, this court grants plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and finds plaintiff has stated a cognizable claim against defendant Mayes. This court further finds plaintiff fails to state a claim against defendant California Correctional Health Care Services (“CCHCS”). Plaintiff will be given an opportunity to either amend his complaint or proceed on the cognizable claim in his current complaint. IN FORMA PAUPERIS Plaintiff has submitted a declaration that makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. §1915(a). Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma…