Pogue

(HC) Martin v. Pogue

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 13, 20221:21-cv-01622California656 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JARED ANDREW MARTIN, Case No. 1:21-cv-01622-DAD-SAB-HC

Petitioner, ORDER DENYING IN PART AND

GRANTING IN PART PETITIONER’S

v. MOTION TO APPOINT COUNSEL AND

AMEND NAME OF CASE, DENYING

CHRISTIAN PFEIFFER, MOTION TO ISSUE SUBPOENA

WITHOUT PREJUDICE, AND DENYING

Respondent. MOTION TO AMEND AS MOOT

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO SUBSTITUTE RESPONDENT

17 (ECF Nos. 29, 30, 31) 18 Petitioner is proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. A. Motion to Appoint Counsel and Amend Name of Case (ECF No. 29) In the motion to appoint counsel and to amend name of case, Petitioner moves for appointment of counsel in what appears to be a separate civil action against Gavin Newsom and requests the Court “to amend current petition to Jared Andrew Martin v. Tyson J. Pogue.” (ECF No. 29). Petitioner’s request for appointment of counsel in his separate civil…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.