Zavala
(PC) Harris v. Zavala
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DARREN L. HARRIS, Case No. 1:21-cv-1126-DAD-HBK Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO
DENY PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE
v. TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (g) A. ZAVALA, (Doc. No. 9) Defendant.
FOURTEEN-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD
17 18 Plaintiff Darren L. Harris, while a prisoner incarcerated at California State Prison, 20 Corcoran,1 initiated this action by filing a pro se prisoner civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on July 26, 2021. (Doc. No. 1, “Complaint”). Plaintiff seeks to proceed in this action in forma pauperis. (Doc. No. 9). For the reasons discussed below, the undersigned recommends the District Court deny Plaintiff’s IFP motion under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) because Plaintiff has had at least three dismissals that constitute strikes and the Complaint does not establish Plaintiff meets the imminent danger exception. BACKGROUND AND FACTS …