(SS) Anaya v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 16, 20222:20-cv-02548California3,626 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BERNICE LENORA ANAYA, No. 2:20-cv-02548 AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant.

17 Plaintiff seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”), denying her application for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) under Title XVI of the Social Security Act (the “Act”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 1381-1383f. For the reasons that follow, the court will deny plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and grant the Commissioner’s cross-motion for summary judgment. //// ////

SSI is paid to financially needy disabled persons. 42 U.S.C. § 1382(a); Washington State Dept. of Social and Health Services v. Guardianship Estate of Keffeler, 537 U.S. 371, 375 (2003) (“Title XVI of the Act, § 1381 et seq., is the Supplemental Security Income (SSI) scheme of benefits for aged, blind, or disabled individuals, including children, whose income and assets fall below…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.