Warden

(PC) Bullette v. Warden

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 16, 20221:21-cv-01519California781 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SONYA BULLETTE, Case No. 1:21-cv-01519-HBK

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

TO EXCLUDE STIMULUS FUNDS FOR

v. PAYMENT OF FILING FEE WARDEN, (Doc. No. 7) Defendants. 16 17 18 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to exclude any stimulus monies from payment of the filing fee for this action. (Doc. No. 7). Plaintiff is a prisoner who is proceeding pro se on a civil rights complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Doc. No. 1). Plaintiff filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis on October 17, 2021. (Doc. No. 5). On November 17, 2021, the Court granted Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis; assessed an initial payment of $123.69 based on Plaintiff’s average 6-month balance as required under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1)(B); and, directed correctional officials to make monthly payments of 20% of the preceding month’s income credited to Plaintiff’s inmate trust…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.