CDCR

(PC) Steele v. CDCR

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 13, 20221:19-cv-00471California2,257 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JUSTIN STEELE, Case No. 1:19-cv-00471-AWI-BAK (SAB) (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DISMISS ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE

v. FOR FAILURE TO EFFECT SERVICE OF

PROCESS

CDCR, et al., 14-DAY OBJECTION DEADLINE Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Justin Steele is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. I. BACKGROUND In his original complaint, Plaintiff named as defendants CDCR (California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation), Warden John Sutton, Correctional Lieutenant E. Venegas, and Correctional Officers J. Carillo, J. Delgadillo, A. Hermosillo, F. Sackett, R. Samarripas, A. Sandoval and R. Calderon. (Doc. 1 at 1, 2.) Following screening, Plaintiff was given leave to amend his complaint, curing the deficiencies identified in the screening order. (Doc. 13.)1 // 27 1 Plaintiff was informed that his amended complaint would…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.