Beard

Beard v. County of Stanislaus

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 17, 20221:21-cv-00841California3,276 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SHANE BEARD, et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-00841-DAD-SAB

Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’

MOTIONS TO COMPEL THIRD PARTIES

v. STANISLAUS FAMILY JUSTICE CENTER

AND C.A.I.R.E. CENTER TO PRODUCE

COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, et al., DOCUMENTS WITHIN 30 DAYS

Defendants. ORDER VACATING MAY 18, 2022

HEARING

16 (ECF Nos. 24, 25)

18 Currently before the Court is Plaintiffs Shane Beard, Hilda Perez, and N.P.’s (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) motion to compel third parties Stanislaus Family Justice Center (“Family Justice Center”) and C.A.I.R.E. Center to produce documents in response to their subpoenas. (ECF Nos. 24, 25.) No oppositions were filed and the deadline to do so has now expired. Accordingly, the Court finds this matter suitable for decision without oral argument and the parties will not be required to appear on May 18, 2022. See Local Rule 230(g). For the reasons explained herein, Plaintiffs’ motion shall be granted, and the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.