Peery
(PC) Reed v. Peery
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY J. REED, No. 2:20-cv-2373 WBS AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER R. PEERY, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the Americans with Disabilities Act. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. Before the court is plaintiff’s first amended complaint (“FAC”). ECF No. 13. For the reasons stated below, plaintiff will be given a final opportunity either to amend the complaint or to proceed on the single cognizable claim identified below. I. FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT Plaintiff, an inmate who is currently housed at Salinas Valley State Prison (“SVSP”), seeks relief for events that took place when he was incarcerated at Mule Creek State Prison (“MCSP”). ECF No. 13 at 1-2. He names the following…