Ramirez

(PC) Juengain v. Ramirez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 17, 20221:22-cv-00064California656 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 IKEELY JUENGAIN, Case No. 1:22-cv-00064-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION

SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

v. FAILURE TO EXHAUST

ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES

A. RAMIREZ,

FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE

Defendant. 16 Ikeely Juengain is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action. (Doc. Nos. 1, 8). Plaintiff acknowledges on the face of his Complaint that he has not exhausted his administrative remedies. (Doc. No. 1 at 3). Under the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995, “[n]o action shall be brought with respect to prison conditions under [42 U.S.C. § 1983], or any other Federal law, by a prisoner confined in any jail, prison, or other correctional facility until such administrative remedies as are available are exhausted.” 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). Exhaustion is condition precedent to filing a civil rights claim. Woodford v. Ngo, 548 U.S. 81, 93 (2006); see also McKinney…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.