Epperson

Epperson v. United States

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 17, 20221:22-cv-00534California1,370 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHRIS EPPERSON, Case No. 1:22-cv-00534-DAD-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DISMISS THE ACTION AND DENY

v. MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA

PAUPERIS

UNITED STATES; JOHN F. KENNEDY;

THEODORE ROOSEVELT; BEN FOURTEEN-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD

FRANKLIN; AND BENJAMIN HARRIS, (Doc. No. 2) Defendants.

17 Plaintiff Chris Epperson, who is proceeding pro se, initiated this action by filing a civil complaint form on May 5, 2022. (Doc. No. 1, “Complaint”). For the reasons set forth herein, the undersigned recommends the district court dismiss this case, without leave to amend the Complaint, because the Court lacks jurisdiction, the Complaint fails to state a claim, and the Complaint is frivolous. The undersigned further recommends the district court deny Plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. /// ///

1 The undersigned submits these factual findings and recommendations…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.