(PC) Camacho v. CMF Vacaville

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 18, 20222:22-cv-00608California405 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LUIS CEJA CAMACHO, No. 2:22-cv-0608 AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

CMF VACAVILLE, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, is proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has filed an in forma pauperis application in which he states that he has cash in the amount of $4,226.21, a monthly gross income of $1,030.04, and monthly expenses of $1,880.00. ECF No. 2. By order filed April 12, 2022, the court found that plaintiff had made an inadequate showing of indigency and he was ordered to either pay the fee or explain why he could not pay the fee within twenty-one days. ECF No. 6. Plaintiff was cautioned that failure to explain why he could not pay the fee would result in a recommendation that the application to proceed in forma pauperis be denied. Id. Twenty-one days have now passed, and plaintiff has not paid the filing fee, explained why he cannot…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.