(PS) McDaniel v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MS. TANYA GRACE MCDANIEL, No. 2:21-cv-1696 WBS DB PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND UNITED STATES, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Tanya Grace McDaniel is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Pending before the court are plaintiff’s complaint, plaintiff’s motion for leave to file an amended complaint, and defendants’ motions for a definite statement and to dismiss. (ECF Nos. 1, 19, 20, 42, 43, 64, 65, 70, 73, 74.) Plaintiff’s complaint concerns delusional allegations. For the reasons explained below, the undersigned finds that plaintiff’s complaint should be dismissed and recommends that plaintiff not be granted leave to amend. STANDARDS I. Legal Standards Applicable to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 The court must dismiss an in forma pauperis case at any time if…