Doe

Clark v. Doe

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 18, 20221:21-cv-01827California676 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 WALTER CLARK, Case No. 1:21-cv-01827-JLT-EPG Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

THAT THIS ACTION BE DISMISSED

v. WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE

TO COMPLETE SERVICE PURSUANT

TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL CMEGRO.TOP, et al., PROCEDURE 4(m) 14 Defendants. OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN 14 DAYS

I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Walter Clark proceeds through counsel in this civil action against Defendant CMEgro.top and Doe Defendants 1-20. (ECF No. 1). Due to Plaintiff’s failure to complete service on CMEgro.top and Does 1-20 pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m), the Court will recommend that this action be dismissed from this action without prejudice. Plaintiff filed the complaint commencing this action on December 29, 2021, generally alleging that Defendants defrauded him of cryptocurrency via an exchange website. (ECF No. 1). A…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.