Vorkulin

(PC) Colston v. Vorkulin

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 19, 20222:21-cv-00542California492 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 KORAN MALCOM COLSTON, No. 2:21-cv-00542 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

V. VORKULIN, et al., Defendants. 15 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. By order dated November 23, 2021, the court found the complaint had stated a cognizable First Amendment retaliation claim against defendants Vorkulin and Guerrero but failed to state any other cognizable claim. (ECF No. 8.) The court ordered plaintiff to file notice informing the court whether he wished to proceed on his cognizable claims or be given leave to file an amended complaint. (Id. at 11.) Plaintiff was given thirty days leave to file such a notice. (Id.) Plaintiff was warned that failure to abide by the court’s order would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. (Id.) //// //// //// //// //// More than thirty days have passed and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.