Perez

(PC) Ramirez v. Perez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 20, 20221:22-cv-00564California1,856 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ISRAEL RAMIREZ, ) Case No. 1:22-cv-00564-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION v. ) SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED, WITHOUT

PREJUDICE, FOR FAILURE TO EXHAUST THE

) PEREZ, et al., ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES ) Defendants. ) (ECF No. 1) ) )

Plaintiff Israel Ramirez is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s complaint, filed May 11, 2022. I. SCREENING REQUIREMENT The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner has raised claims that are legally “frivolous or malicious,” that “fail[] to state…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.