(PS) Zamudio v. FMC Corp.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 20, 20222:16-cv-02693California781 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAUL ZAMUDIO and SOLEDAD No. 2:16-cv-02693-TLN-DB

ZAMUDIO,

12 Plaintiffs, ORDER v. 14 FMC CORPORATION and DOES 1 through 20, Defendants. 17 18 This matter is before the Court on the law firm of Abir Cohen Treyson Salo, LLP, specifically attorney Boris Treyzon’s (collectively, “ACTS”) Motion to Withdraw as Counsel for Plaintiffs Raul and Soledad Zamudio (“Plaintiffs”). (ECF No. 80.) No opposition has been filed. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS the motion. The local rules of this district require an attorney who would withdraw and leave his or her client without representation to obtain leave of court upon a noticed motion. E.D. Cal. L.R. 182(d). Local Rule 182(d) also requires an attorney to provide notice to the client and all other parties who have appeared, and an affidavit stating the current or last known address of the client. Id. Finally, to comply with Local Rule 182(d), the attorney must conform…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.