Primm

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 JIMMIE STEPHENS, Case No. 2:22-cv-00330-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER THAT THE CLERK OF COURT

ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE TO THIS

v. CASE PRIMM, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

THAT PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION TO

Defendants. PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS BE

DENIED

14 ECF No. 2

THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE

17 18 Plaintiff has filed a request to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No. 2. He is, as I explained in my previous order, ECF No. 5, a “three-striker” within the meaning of Title 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Plaintiff was previously determined to have filed at least three cases that were dismissed for failure to state a viable claim. See Stephen v. Zhang, No. 2:12-cv-630-GGH-P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 19, 2012) at ECF Nos. 7 & 9. Three-strikers may still proceed in forma pauperis if their complaint makes a showing of imminent physical danger. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

1In this case, Judge Hollows found that plaintiff had…