Sherzad
(UD)(PS) Wells Fargo Bank, National Assoc. v. Sherzad
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Wells Fargo Bank, No. 2:22-cv-00820-KJM-CKD Plaintiff, ORDER v. Atall Sherzad, et al., 1S Defendants. 16 Defendants Atall Sherzad and Mizhgan Alam, who appear pro se, removed this unlawful 18 detainer action from the Superior Court of Shasta County. See Not. Removal, ECF No. 1. The court has reviewed the complaint and notice of removal and has determined on its own motion 20 that it lacks subject matter jurisdiction. This action is thus remanded to the state court. When a case “of which the district courts of the United States have original jurisdiction” is 22 initially brought in state court, a defendant may remove it to federal court. 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a). There are two primary bases for federal subject matter jurisdiction: federal question jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331, and diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. First, under § 1331, district courts have…