Khoo

(PC) Gray v. Khoo

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 19, 20221:20-cv-01047California1,622 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DANA GRAY, ) Case No.: 1:20-cv-01047-DAD-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION v. ) TO COMPEL

A. KHOO, et al., ) (ECF No. 90) ) Defendants. ) ) )

Plaintiff Dana Gray is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to compel, filed April 27, 2022. I. RELEVANT BACKGROUND This action is proceeding on Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants R. Mitchell and G. Song for denial of plaintiff’s revision surgery; against Defendant Mitchell for directing that her Gabapentin be terminated in violation of the Eighth Amendment; against Defendant Mitchell for denial of pain medication in violation of the Eighth Amendment; and medical malpractice against Defendants Mitchell and Song for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.