Campbell

(HC) Huston v. Campbell

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 20, 20222:21-cv-02277California1,009 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHAQVILLE HUSTON, No. 2:21-cv-2277 TLN AC P Petitioner, v. ORDER SACRAMENTO SUPERIOR COURT, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, seeks habeas relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 and has requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. ECF Nos. 1, 2, 6. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On April 29, 2022, the undersigned recommended that this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute because petitioner had failed to file an amended complaint as he had been directed to do in February 2022. ECF No. 9. Petitioner has filed objections indicating that he wishes to pursue this case, and explaining that he had not received the ordering directing amendment due to his transfers from one prison to another. ECF No. 10. Accordingly, the recommendation for dismissal will be withdrawn. 27…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.