Sullivan

(PC) Snowden v. Sullivan

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 23, 20221:20-cv-00415California721 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DANIEL L. SNOWDEN, ) Case No.: 1:20-cv-0415 JLT SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND ) RECOMMENDATION, AND GRANTING v. ) MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FOR ) FAILURE TO EXHAUST W. SULLIVAN, et al., ) ) (Docs. 33, 39) Defendants. ) ) )

Daniel Snowden seeks to hold the defendants liable for deliberate indifference in violation of the Eighth Amendment pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (See Doc. 10.) Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment, asserting Plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative remedies as required by the Prison Litigation Reform Act. (Doc. 33.) Plaintiff did not respond to the motion. The assigned magistrate judge found the CDCR had an administrative grievance process available to Plaintiff, but Plaintiff failed to exhaust his claims through the administrative process prior to filing suit. (Doc. 39 at 6-8.) The magistrate judge recommended…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.