Hurley

(PC) Diaz v. Hurley

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 23, 20222:19-cv-01241California537 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MIGUEL ENRIQUE DIAZ, No. 2:19-cv-1241 KJM KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER ASSOCIATE WARDEN HURLEY, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, proceeds pro se with this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On May 24, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. On June 17, 2021, and August 6, 2021, plaintiff was granted thirty-day extensions of time to file objections. (ECF Nos. 67, 70.) On October 25, 2021, plaintiff was granted one final sixty-day extension of time to file objections, and warned that no further extensions of time would be granted for any reason. ///// ///// 28 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.