(SS) Bispo v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 20, 20221:20-cv-01457California9,149 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANTHONY BISPO, Case No. 1:20-cv-01457-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER REMANDING ACTION FOR

FURTHER PROCEEDINGS

v. (ECF No. 20) COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. 16 17 18 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Anthony Bispo (“Plaintiff”) seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner” or “Defendant”) denying his application for Social Security Income (SSI) benefits pursuant to Title XVI of the Social Security Act. The matter is currently before the Court on the parties’ briefs, which were submitted without oral argument, to Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone. For the reasons set forth below, the action shall be remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings. 27 The parties have consented to the jurisdiction of the United States Magistrate Judge and this action has been assigned to Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone for all purposes. (ECF Nos. 8, 9, 10.) …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.