Booth
Booth v. Campbell
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PATRICK J. BOOTH, Case No. 1:21-cv-00123-JLT-BAM Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
FOR RECONSIDERATION
v. (Doc. 13) TOLBERT CAMPBELL, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Patrick J. Booth is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed a motion for an order appointing counsel to represent him in this case. (Doc. 10.) The assigned magistrate judge denied Plaintiff’s motion. (Doc. 11.) Plaintiff then filed a document titled “Objections, Notice of Withdrawing of Magistrate Participation on this Case.” (Doc. 13.) The Court construes this as a motion for reconsideration of the magistrate judge’s ruling on the motion for appointment of counsel. However, the document does not offer sufficient grounds for reconsideration under the applicable “clearly erroneous” standard. See McDonald v. Waddington, No. C07-0135-JCC-BAT, 2009 WL 302279, at *2 (W.D.…