Booth

Booth v. Campbell

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 23, 20221:21-cv-00123California537 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PATRICK J. BOOTH, Case No. 1:21-cv-00123-JLT-BAM Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR RECONSIDERATION

v. (Doc. 13) TOLBERT CAMPBELL, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Patrick J. Booth is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed a motion for an order appointing counsel to represent him in this case. (Doc. 10.) The assigned magistrate judge denied Plaintiff’s motion. (Doc. 11.) Plaintiff then filed a document titled “Objections, Notice of Withdrawing of Magistrate Participation on this Case.” (Doc. 13.) The Court construes this as a motion for reconsideration of the magistrate judge’s ruling on the motion for appointment of counsel. However, the document does not offer sufficient grounds for reconsideration under the applicable “clearly erroneous” standard. See McDonald v. Waddington, No. C07-0135-JCC-BAT, 2009 WL 302279, at *2 (W.D.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.